Insurance broker hit with lawsuit over coronavirus exclusion clause

Lawsuits over the denial of business interruption claims are on the rise as businesses face mounting losses from shutdowns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the latest instance, an insurance brokerage and its employee are facing a lawsuit for their part in a carrier’s alleged denial of business interruption claims related to the outbreak.

Insurance broker Nottingham Agency and its agent, Jonathan M. Crook, were named in a lawsuit filed in Philadelphia by legal firm Magna Legal Services against Hartford Fire Insurance Company, according to a Law360 report.

Read more: Litigation over business interruption insurance heats up

In the lawsuit, Magna alleged that Hartford’s refusal to cover the more than $50,000 in lost income the legal firm sustained during the government-ordered shutdown of non-essential services in mid-March was in violation of its business insurance policy. While Hartford claimed that a clause in the policy excluded coverage for income lost during the pandemic, Magna countered that Nottingham Agency and Crook never explained that coverage for losses related to viruses, pandemics, or “related orders of civil authorities” were excluded.

“Magna’s business is heavily dependent on law firms, corporations, and government agencies across the country, whose operations have also been interrupted by civil authority orders,” Magna told Law360, adding that its operations were also suspended by “court orders closing the courts.”

According to Law360, Magna – which has offices in New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago – wants Hartford to pay for all pandemic-related business interruption losses, as well as attorney fees and damages.

Hartford is already facing a similar lawsuit in California from famed Michelin-starred chef Thomas Keller.

View Original Article Source